← Dashboard

Batch 100

Status: ready_for_review · Triggered by: michelle · Brief: weight loss angle, voiceover only

100-001Nothing In That Aisle Was Ever Going To Fit

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Strategy Brief Aug 3 → Aug 16: "Retire the B089/Icon-UGC assembly-edit format for weightloss. Redirect the format budget toward the static villain/permission-framing shape that just won."
  • unknown: Graduated static "Bad Day To Be A Carb" (weightloss, $46 test CPP) — headline is a carb-shaming joke; the 28g/12g/350 row sits *below* it as supporting proof.
  • unknown: Graduated evergreen static "It Feels Forbidden" — villain-framing headline, longest-running static on the account.
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "the balance / without giving up message is the closest thing to a universal hook."
Context (2)
  • Angle: The villain-framing shape that is currently winning for weightloss, executed as comedy instead of a static. The category is the antagonist and it gets physically destroyed on camera; the reframe is absolution — you didn't fail at ramen, ramen failed at you. Deadpan narrator over slapstick. No character, no confession, no testimonial.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Evergreen Hooks, Kevin's R&D for 1st Recipe, B-roll, Product/Packaging, Retail Stores
  • Scene count: 11
  • Priority: high — villain/permission framing is the only weightloss shape with live evidence behind it, and it has never been tested as motion-comedy. Furthest possible structure from the retired compilation template.
  • Research signal: Strategy Brief Aug 3→16 — weightloss's only surviving format is a villain/permission-framing headline; the account "hasn't tested that shape at volume yet."
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Template 2 villain framing
  • Runtime: ~42s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:03] Video. Kevin behind kitchen counter yelling "Stop! Stop eating cheap instant ramen."STOP.Okay. Somebody had to say it.
[0:03-0:06] Video. Kevin smashing instant ramen packet with a hammer(no text)The reason you gave up ramen was never discipline.
[0:06-0:09] Video. Throwing a pile of cheap instant ramen onto the ground(no text)It's that nothing in that aisle was ever built to fit anything.
[0:09-0:13] Image. Nutritional labels of traditional instant ramenread the backRefined noodles. Barely any protein. Basically no fiber. You're hungry again in an hour and it cost you the rest of your day.
[0:13-0:16] Video. Kevin jumping on instant ramen packets(no text)So, no. You didn't fail at it.
[0:16-0:19] Video. Putting ramen brick into a blender(no text)It failed you. Repeatedly.
[0:19-0:23] Video. Kevins testing different noodle prototypestwo yearsWhich is why two guys spent two years rebuilding the noodle instead of the marketing.
[0:23-0:27] Video. Dropping ramen brick into boiling pot of waterstill five minutesSame five minutes. Same craving. Same cupboard.
[0:27-0:32] Video. Macro close ups of fully garnished ramen bowl(no text)Completely different math.
[0:32-0:37] Video. Nutrition panel28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calTwenty-eight grams of protein. Twelve grams of fiber. Three fifty a bowl.
[0:37-0:42] Video. Person grabbing immi off shelvesimmieats.comYou don't have to walk past the ramen anymore. immi. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-002We Never Told Them What Was In It

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "Taste skepticism" is the #1 objection cluster and rising — 6.5% of recent responses (5.7% → 5.2% → 6.5%).
  • Typeform verbatim (trust cluster): "Concerns if it will help to lose weight or if it's real."
  • Graduation Learnings — @EricSiebecker "Wait This Bowl Has 28 Grams Of Protein": *"the only [variant] that leads with taste rather than the number — the reaction lands before the claim does."*
  • Amazon 2026-05-11 / competitor texture failures: category reviews cite "waxy," "cardboard," "chewing on string" — independent proof-of-taste is scarce and valuable.
Context (2)
  • Angle: The blind-test door. Every weight-loss ad asserts the food is good; this one removes the assertion entirely and shows strangers reacting to it before they know a single thing about it. The persuasive move is the *withholding* — the macros only arrive after the taste verdict is already in. Uses the Times Square / street-interview / consumer-panel footage no weight-loss edit has ever touched.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Events, Social Content, UGC Content, B-roll
  • Scene count: 10
  • Priority: medium — taste skepticism is the largest and fastest-rising objection in the survey data, and this is the only proof format that answers it without a brand claim. Format risk: street footage may not cut clean.
  • Research signal: Typeform recent-cohort objections — taste skepticism is the only objection rising alongside sodium.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Template 3 (community/reaction proof)
  • Runtime: ~43s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:03] Video. immi truck at Times Square (Can be found in "Times Square Truck Shoot" on Air)no pitchWe took it to Times Square and explained nothing.
[0:03-0:07] Video. Team passing out ramen packets in Times Square (Can be found in "Times Square Truck Shoot" on Air)(no text)No macros, no health talk. Just — here. Try this.
[0:07-0:12] Street interview subject tries to guess the amount of protein in immi (Can be found in "Guess the Protein" folder on Air)guess the proteinThen we asked people to guess what was actually in it.
[0:12-0:16] Taste reactions from street interview subjects (Can be found in "immi for lunch final episodes" folder on Air)nobody got closeNobody got close. Everybody guessed like it was regular ramen.
[0:16-0:21] Video. Consumer taste-test panel with numbered sample cups lined across a bench — JTS TTS / a6508caf4numbered cups, no labelsWe ran it blind too. No branding, no story, no reason to be polite about it.
[0:21-0:25] Video. Taste reactions at Expowest booth(no text)Same reaction, over and over.
[0:25-0:29] Video. Team talking to guests at ExpoWest booth(no text)Which is the whole point. If it tasted like diet food you'd know in one bite. Everyone does.
[0:29-0:34] Video. Full nutrition panel on a yellow immi pack held steady to camera — JTS TTS / a4618edbc28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calTwenty-eight grams of protein. Twelve grams of fiber. Three hundred fifty calories.
[0:34-0:38] Video. Macro close up of someone slurping up noodles(no text)And not one of them liked it for that. Which is exactly why it's the one people keep eating.
[0:38-0:43] Video. Hero shot, panning into ramen packets onto tableimmieats.comimmi. Fits your goals. Doesn't taste like it. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-003Everything Else Was Made By Taking Things Out

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Reddit 2026-07-27: "is there any healthy instant ramen?" — pure unmet category demand.
  • Memory 2026-08-25: category-wide "where is the protein actually?" distrust — competitor reviews now doubt the protein claim and blame off-flavors on it.
  • Script Index: "Truth About Instant Ramen (expose)" and "200 Recipes" — both long-running proven staples built on process/villain framing; spec-free = evergreen.
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "healthier version of the food I love" is now the #1 purchase trigger at 30.7%, up from 17.6%.
Context (2)
  • Angle: The subtraction door, proven by process rather than asserted. Every "lighter" version of a food you love is a removal — less flour, less flavor, less of the reason you wanted it — which is why they all taste like a compromise and why you quit them. immi is the inverse: a noodle built from scratch to have *more* in it. Documentary VO over the manufacturing and prototype archive. Not a founder origin story — the founders never appear as characters, only as hands.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Kevin's R&D for 1st Recipe, Prototypes, Manufacturing, R&D, Product/Packaging, B-roll
  • Scene count: 12
  • Priority: high — answers the credibility objection that is now category-wide, and it is the furthest edit in this batch from the retired creator-compilation template. Also the only mechanism argument in the batch.
  • Research signal: Memory 2026-08-25 — protein-credibility distrust; plus Reddit's recurring "is there any healthy instant ramen?" demand signal.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Unique Mechanism framework
  • Runtime: ~50s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Image. Traditional instant ramens spread out on counter/in a box(no text)Every lighter version of a food you love is made the exact same way. By taking things out.
[0:04-0:08] Image. Kevins researching noodle prototypes(no text)Less flour. Less fat. Less flavor. Less of the thing that made you want it in the first place.
[0:08-0:12] Image. Unappealing early noodle prototypesattempt oneSo when two guys tried to build a ramen that actually fit a goal, they went the other direction. It went badly for a long time.
[0:12-0:16] Video. Putting ramen flour through machine(no text)They weren't reformulating a noodle. They were building one.
[0:16-0:20] Video. Dough sheeting(no text)Protein and fiber in the dough itself. Not dusted on afterward so it can go on the front of a box.
[0:20-0:24] Video. Testing out machines for ramen development(no text)Which meant new machines, because nothing that already existed could make it.
[0:24-0:28] Video. R&D taking notes on batchhundreds of batchesHundreds of batches. Most of them thrown out for tasting like exactly what you're picturing.
[0:28-0:32] Image. Appealing early noodle prototypethis oneUntil one of them chewed the way ramen is supposed to chew.
[0:32-0:36] Video. Ramen moving on a conveyer belt(no text)That's the one that got built.
[0:36-0:40] Video. Ramen brick being packaged by a machine(no text)Same five minutes as the cheap stuff. Same cupboard.
[0:40-0:45] Video. Nutrition panel28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calTwenty-eight grams of protein. Twelve grams of fiber — about forty-three percent of your day. Three hundred fifty calories.
[0:45-0:50] Video. Medium shots of fully garnished ramen bowlimmieats.comNothing was removed to get there. It was added. immi, at immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-004Nobody Doing This Is Doing Anything Weird

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • TikTok Agency Brief (canonical buyer): 3M+ customers, 7,000+ retail locations (Whole Foods, Sprouts, Target, CVS), 35-65 age skew, top-10% HHI, ~54% female.
  • Memory 2026-05-04: 26.7% of buyers are 55-64 — Meta + Google purchase data inverts the "young TikTok target" default.
  • Typeform Q5: the most common answer to "who recommended this" is "myself / no one" — the Self-Directed Researcher identity.
  • Signal Trackers: Celebrity Attribution declining as a trigger (6.1% → 3.2%); consensus proof outperforms endorsement.
Context (2)
  • Angle: The permission-by-consensus door. The felt objection for a 45-to-60-year-old buyer isn't "does it work," it's "is this one of *those* things." The entire argument is scale and ordinariness: it's on the shelf at the store you already go to, three million people already eat it, and none of them would describe themselves as being on a diet. Retail + warehouse + press footage doing a job no weight-loss edit has given it.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Retail Stores, Warehouse, Press, B-roll
  • Scene count: 11
  • Priority: medium — squarely aimed at the account's actual age skew and the deliberative-buyer trend, but consensus proof is a softer hook than villain framing. Cheap to cut; strong LP-retest candidate.
  • Research signal: Typeform "None / nothing stopped me" declining 15.1% → 10.2% — new buyers are more deliberative and need social permission, not a louder claim.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Demand Gen vs Capture (capture side)
  • Runtime: ~44s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Video. POV walking through grocery aisles(no text)For a long time, eating toward a goal meant ordering something strange off the internet and hiding it in the pantry.
[0:04-0:08] Video. Panned video showing immi on shelves(no text)It doesn't anymore.
[0:08-0:12] Video. Person grabbing immi off shelves(no text)It's just on the shelf now. Regular aisle. Next to everything else you already buy.
[0:12-0:16] Video. Kevin holding immi in front of Whole FoodsWhole FoodsWhole Foods.
[0:16-0:19] Video. Kevin holding immi in front of SproutsSproutsSprouts.
[0:19-0:22] Video. Kevin holding immi packet in CVS aisle7,000+ storesCVS. Seven thousand stores and counting.
[0:22-0:26] Image. Customers posing with immi in Whole Foods's grocery aisle3,000,000+ peopleThree million people have bought it, and almost none of them would tell you they're on a diet.
[0:26-0:31] Video. Hero shot of inventory scale(no text)They just wanted one meal in the week that wasn't quietly working against them.
[0:31-0:35] Video. Putting immi boxes onto pallets28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calRamen. Twenty-eight grams of protein, twelve grams of fiber, three hundred fifty calories.
[0:35-0:39] Image. immi featured in magazines(no text)That's the entire trick. There isn't a second part.
[0:39-0:44] Video. Macro close up of someone taking a satisfying biteimmieats.comYou're not doing anything weird. You're eating better ramen. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-005The Meal You Thought Was Neutral

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Memory 2026-08-24: "immi ramen nutrition facts" is a **breakout Google Trends query, +69,950%** — nutrition-panel-forward creative is demanded and unwritten.
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "keeps you full / a healthier version of the food you love" beats single-macro hooks (Motion: 10% hit rate for outcome vs 1% for "high protein").
  • Fiber & Gut Health tracker: 1.4% customer citation vs 43% DV in the product — "severely under-claimed; biggest open opportunity."
  • Strategy Brief Aug 3→16: "the macro stat is a proof beat, never the opening claim — in any format."
Context (2)
  • Angle: The audit door. The food quietly costing you isn't the dessert — you already know about the dessert. It's the thing you'd never bother counting: the cheap packet you eat on nights you don't cook. The ad teaches one behavior (turn it over and read the back), then applies the same test to immi so the macro lands as *the viewer's own verdict* instead of a brand claim. Directly serves the nutrition-facts search breakout.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Human Desires, Kevin's R&D for 1st Recipe, Product/Packaging, B-roll
  • Scene count: 10
  • Priority: high — a breakout branded search query with zero creative built against it is the cheapest demand in the account right now, and the panel-forward format has never run.
  • Research signal: Google Trends 2026-08-24 — "immi ramen nutrition facts" +69,950%; "protein noodles" the only rising core keyword.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Template 2 (category gap)
  • Runtime: ~43s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Video. Woman coming home from work6:40pmThe meal that's actually costing you isn't the dessert. You know about the dessert.
[0:04-0:08] Image. Traditional instant ramen on grocery shelves(no text)It's the one you never think about. The cheap thing in the cupboard you eat on the nights you're not cooking.
[0:08-0:13] Image. Nutritional labels of traditional instant ramenturn it overTurn it over sometime. Six grams of protein. Almost no fiber. And you were standing in the kitchen again at nine.
[0:13-0:17] Video. Person eating junk food at a table alone. Looking guilty and insecure(no text)That's not a willpower problem. A meal that doesn't hold you will send you back. Every single time.
[0:17-0:22] Video. Nutrition panel28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calSo read this one the same way you just read that one. Twenty-eight grams of protein. Twelve grams of fiber — forty-three percent of your day. Three hundred fifty calories.
[0:22-0:26] Video. Product front/back(no text)Same cupboard. Same five minutes. Same craving at the same hour.
[0:26-0:30] Video. Removing ramen brick from packaging(no text)Nothing about your evening has to change.
[0:30-0:34] Video. Pouring broth into a bowl(no text)The difference is what it does to the rest of it.
[0:34-0:38] Video. Garnishing bowl of ramen with toppings(no text)You eat it, you're genuinely full, and you don't go back in.
[0:38-0:43] Video. Person working on laptop, takes a break to eat from immi ramen bowlimmieats.comOne swap, on the nights you weren't going to cook anyway. immi. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-006The Emails Aren't About Ramen

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Memory 2026-05-11 (Typeform canonical verbatim): the "texting with my son" response — the full word-of-mouth → outcome → objection → rationalization arc in one buyer's own words.
  • Typeform Q5: most common referral answer is "myself / no one"; second is a named family member — not an influencer.
  • Signal Trackers: Celebrity Attribution declining as a trigger, 6.1% → 3.2%.
  • Strategy Brief Aug 3→16: people-first cold opens beat product-first — "leading straight on the two-person conviction line beat the food-shot open."
Context (2)
  • Angle: The received-testimony door. Not creators paid to say a thing — the founders reading what strangers sent them, unprompted, years in. It reframes the purchase as something that reached you through a person rather than an ad, which is how it actually reaches most buyers. Structurally the opposite of a testimonial compilation: nobody in this edit is selling, they're receiving. Casting skews explicitly older.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Social Content, Press, Kevins, UGC Content, B-roll
  • Scene count: 10
  • Priority: medium — highest-trust format available and it uses the archive's most under-cut footage, but it's a slow burn and will live or die on the first three seconds.
  • Research signal: Typeform purchase-decision verbatim (2026-05-11) — the word-of-mouth arc; celebrity/influencer attribution now the weakest trigger in the mix.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Founder Narrative framework
  • Runtime: ~45s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Video. Founders reacting to customer reviews(no text)The messages that come in are almost never about ramen.
[0:04-0:09] Video. Founder holding a phone up to camera showing a customer email under a mind-blown emoji sticker — TTS Most Savage Review / 17d29990(no text)Somebody writes to say they've been trying to lose weight for four years, and this is the first thing they haven't quit.
[0:09-0:13] Video. Stack of verified five-star review cards layered over a bowl of ramen — TTS Business Origin Story / bf88b1f5(no text)Somebody else says her husband eats it twice a week and still has no idea it's the one that fits.
[0:13-0:18] Video. Two founders seated side by side to camera at an office table with bowls in front of them — TTS Most Savage Review / 17d29990(no text)Here's the part we didn't expect. Hardly any of them found it from an ad.
[0:18-0:22] Image. immi featured in online articles(no text)They heard it from a person. A sister. A coworker. A son who kept texting about it until they ordered a box to make him stop.
[0:22-0:26] Video. Kevins laughing on the couch together(no text)That's how this has gone for three million people.
[0:26-0:31] Video. Finished bowl of ramen handed across a home kitchen from one pair of hands to another — TTS I Love Ramen / b0157c202(no text)Not because it's a diet product. It isn't one.
[0:31-0:36] Video. Older man in a dark floral shirt eating ramen from a clear glass bowl — TTS I Love Ramen / b0157c20228g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calIt's ramen. Twenty-eight grams of protein, twelve grams of fiber, three hundred fifty calories — so it fits whatever you happen to be working on.
[0:36-0:41] Video. Macro close ups of fully garnished ramen bowl(no text)And it's good enough that you keep eating it. Which is the only reason anything has ever worked.
[0:41-0:45] Video. Black end card with the immi logo reading SLURP IMMI NOW — TTS I Love Ramen / b0157c202immieats.comimmi. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-007Your Plan Assumed An Evening You Don't Have

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "Convenience / quick / busy" is the only trigger cluster rising steadily across all three cohorts (3.8% → 4.2% → 4.6%).
  • Strategy Brief Aug 3→16: the cycle's one weightloss winner is "The every night meal that stops the snacking" — a chronic-behavior framing, not a body framing.
  • Memory 2026-07-07: bare "lose weight" reads as problem-agitation copy and dies; mechanism framings scale.
  • Audience Atlas: Convenience Maximizer is 🟢 active core, coverage ⚠️ partial — never crossed with weight loss.
Context (2)
  • Angle: The lead-time door. Diets aren't lost to craving, they're lost to the gap between hungry and fed — twenty-five minutes, a store you didn't get to, and a sink you don't want to look at. Recasts the nightly delivery order as a design failure of the plan rather than a failure of the person, and makes the five minutes the mechanism. Convenience × weight loss, a crossing this account has never tested.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Human Desires, B-roll
  • Scene count: 11
  • Priority: high — mechanism framing rather than body framing, aimed at the one rising trigger cluster in the survey, and built entirely from frustration footage that has sat unused.
  • Research signal: Typeform convenience trigger rising in every cohort; the cycle's only weightloss winner is a behavior-loop framing, not an outcome claim.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Demand Gen (problem-first)
  • Runtime: ~45s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Video. Person looking inconvenienced walking through grocery aisles(no text)Every eating plan you've ever been handed assumes a version of your evening that does not exist.
[0:04-0:08] Video. Person looking frustrated with cooking inconveninent meals at home(no text)It assumes you got to the store. It assumes you're not completely done by seven.
[0:08-0:12] Video. Person looking agitated having to wait for meal to cook in kitchen25 minutesIt assumes twenty-five minutes standing between you and food.
[0:12-0:16] Video. Person cleaning dishes at the sinkand then thisAnd a sink you're willing to deal with afterward.
[0:16-0:20] Video. A woman is ordering delivery7:40pmSo at seven forty you do the only reasonable thing available to you. And the day's gone.
[0:20-0:24] Video. Person ripping open ramen packet, quick and satisfying(no text)The fix was never more discipline. It was closing that gap.
[0:24-0:28] Video. Dropping ramen brick into boiling pot of waterfive minutesFive minutes. One pot.
[0:28-0:32] Video. Pouring seasoning packet into ramen(no text)Nothing to plan on Sunday. Nothing to thaw.
[0:32-0:36] Video. Pulling noodles from pot into a bowl28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calTwenty-eight grams of protein, twelve grams of fiber, three hundred fifty calories.
[0:36-0:40] Video. Person on couch with a laptop feeling productive(no text)Fast enough that you actually do it on the night it matters. Which is most nights, really.
[0:40-0:45] Video. Empty bowl / finished meal signalsimmieats.comThat's the whole difference. immi. immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise

100-008Week Six Is Where It Always Goes

Status: pending · Platform: meta · v1

Sources (4)
  • Reddit Expansion 2026-05-12 (r/loseit, r/1200isplenty, r/volumeeating): repetition fatigue is the dominant stated reason people abandon a plan — not hunger.
  • Typeform 2026-05-04: "healthier version of the food I love" is the #1 trigger at 30.7% — people want their food back, not a substitute.
  • Graduation Learnings — @mealynnwong cook-along, best CPP of the cycle ($26 test CPP, 7 purchases): walks an actual upgrade recipe and lands the macro at the close, not the open.
  • Amazon 2026-05-11: recipe / build-your-bowl content demand recurring in review language.
Context (2)
  • Angle: The boredom door. Nobody quits at week six because they're hungry — they quit because they've eaten the same four meals since January. Reframes immi not as a meal but as a *base* that goes in ten directions, so the thing staying constant is the math, not the dinner. The one edit in the batch built on the food library, and the only one that ends on something other than a claim.
  • Channel tag: assembly-video
  • Scene categories used: Human Desires, Product/Packaging, B-roll
  • Scene count: 11
  • Priority: medium — a genuinely unwritten behavioral reframe with the best-CPP shape of the cycle behind it (recipe build, macro at the close), but food-led edits historically underperform people-led cold opens.
  • Research signal: Reddit weight-loss subs — monotony as the stated quit reason; @mealynnwong cook-along economics.
  • Template used: Template 9 (Assembly Video Edit) + Template 4 (Winning Ad Remix — cook-along structure)
  • Runtime: ~46s
Scene (timestamps)On-Screen TextVoiceover
[0:00-0:04] Video. Person rummaging through immi packetsweek sixNobody quits at week six because they're hungry.
[0:04-0:08] Video. Flavor lineup(no text)They quit because they've eaten the same four meals since January and they cannot look at another one.
[0:08-0:12] Video. Chopping vegetables(no text)Boredom has ended more of these than cravings ever have.
[0:12-0:16] Video. Cooking and slicing chicken(no text)Which is the argument for a base instead of a meal.
[0:16-0:20] Video. Close up of cutting into egg, satisfying(no text)One bowl you can send in ten directions. Soft egg tonight.
[0:20-0:24] Video. Garnishing bowl of ramen with toppings(no text)Chicken and greens tomorrow. Chili oil on the day you want it to hurt a little.
[0:24-0:28] Video. Beauty shot of ramen as a pasta alternative(no text)Drain the broth off and it isn't even soup anymore.
[0:28-0:33] Video. Macro close up of broth filling up spoon28g protein · 12g fiber · 350 calAnd underneath all of it, the same numbers every time. Twenty-eight grams of protein. Twelve grams of fiber. Three hundred fifty calories.
[0:33-0:37] Video. Sharing immi with a signficant other(no text)So it stays boring in the one place boring is actually useful.
[0:37-0:41] Video. Looking in mirror feeling confident(no text)And interesting everywhere it counts.
[0:41-0:46] Video. Multi-pack / box shotsimmieats.comA whole box of them. Five minutes each. immi, at immieats.com.
❌ Reject
🔄 Revise